Rethinking Biofuel Enthusiasm

The political importance of corn-growing, ethanol-making Iowa is one reason that biofuel mandates flow from Washington the way oil would flow from the (ANWR) if it had nominating caucuses.

ANWR’s 10.4 billion barrels of oil have become hostage to the planet’s saviors (e.g., , , ), who block drilling in even a of ANWR. You could fit Massachusetts, New Jersey, Rhode Island, Connecticut and Delaware into ANWR’s frozen desolation; the “footprint” of the would be one sixth the size of Washington’s .

To avoid ’s moonscape, the planet savers evidently prefer destroying forests, even though they absorb . Will ethanol prevent more carbon-dioxide emissions than would have been absorbed by the trees cut down to clear land for the production of crops for ethanol? Be that as it may, governments mandating the use of biofuels are one reason for the in , which is driving demand for more arable land. That demand is driving the —and . In Indonesia alone, 44 million acres have been razed to make way for production of .

If the argument for ethanol is that domestically produced energy should be increased, there are better ways of doing that. On the there is a 50-year supply of clean-burning natural gas, 420 trillion cubic feet of it, that the government, at the behest of the planet’s saviors, will not allow to be extracted.

~George Will in his The Biofuel Follies

Related posts

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Daily News | Mortgage Site | Mortgage Rates